Summary/Response
Summary- Name the source Main Idea of the article Supporting details In your own words (paraphrased)
Response –
Your opinion
Can include quotes or paraphrasing
Should include information from your life, experience, previous learning, past readings, etc Discuss something specific from the article |
Essay Structure
Introduction –
Hook, general statement
Introduce your topic(s) Thesis
Body paragraph(s)-
Supporting detail (support your thesis) Discussion, evidence, etc
Conclusion -
reword (your thesis) remind(the reader of your points) relate (make it feel finished) |
CATW
Introduction -
Hook or GS
Summarize the article
Thesis
Body paragraph(s) -
Respond to the article
Back up your claims with evidence, discussion, and/or previous learning, etc
You MUST refer to specific parts of the article (quote or paraphrase)
Introduction -
Hook or GS
Summarize the article
Thesis
Body paragraph(s) -
Respond to the article
Back up your claims with evidence, discussion, and/or previous learning, etc
You MUST refer to specific parts of the article (quote or paraphrase)
Conclusion
-
reword
remind
relate
reword
remind
relate
Source
Multitasking negatively affects our brains
Experiments showed we’re better at doing things one at a time
We’re not as efficient even after we stop multitasking
When we do things all at once, we don’t do any of them well
Your brain has limits to what it can do at one time
We don’t know the effects, but we think they’re bad
There are things you can do to improve your brain function after hurting it with multitasking
Multitasking negatively affects our brains
Experiments showed we’re better at doing things one at a time
We’re not as efficient even after we stop multitasking
When we do things all at once, we don’t do any of them well
Your brain has limits to what it can do at one time
We don’t know the effects, but we think they’re bad
There are things you can do to improve your brain function after hurting it with multitasking
Summaries
What is a summary?
Using your own words, briefly describe the
writing’s main ideas.
Include:
*Main idea(s)
-Talk about the story
*Cite (name) your source
- Title, Author, where it was published (such as the title of a newspaper)
*Use your own words (paraphrase)
*Longer than one sentence, shorter than original *Only talk about what the author has said
*If there are two opinions, you must share
BOTH
|
Don’t Include:
*Small details -Don’t retell the story
*Do not quote the author directly
*Do not share your opinion |
Source?
Boys and Girls Together… Jennifer Medina … New York Times
Boys and Girls Together… Jennifer Medina … New York Times
What is/are the main idea(s)?
Children being taught separated from the opposite gender
What are some of the supporting details?
1. How classes are conducted
2. Not everyone agrees on the new system
Children being taught separated from the opposite gender
What are some of the supporting details?
1. How classes are conducted
2. Not everyone agrees on the new system
3. Implemented to address decreasing test
scores and increasing behavioral problems
4. It is an experiment – no scientific
evidence of effectiveness
Are there two opinions? What are they?
Some parents see better behavior from their
children
Some believe it reinforces bad things
Thesis: Boys and girls should not be separated
- Discourages healthy interaction (Paragraphs 1 and 2 |
Paragraph 4)
- Won’t be prepared for the future (paragraph 5, line 3)
Some schools are teaching children in gender-segregated
classrooms, according to the article “Boys and Girls
Together, Taught Separately in School” by Jennifer Medina printed in The
New York Times. In classrooms separate
from the other gender, boys are taught by a teacher who behaves like he is
coaching a sports team, while the girls are taught by a woman who uses a much
more sensitive approach. The
new approach is an experiment that many schools are trying across the country
to address problems in test scores and students’ behavior, but the strategy is
getting mixed reviews. While
some parents feel that their child is paying more attention without the added
distraction of the opposite gender in the classroom, some experts are worried
about the future implications of the new teaching strategy, insisting that it
will hurt children later in life when they can no longer avoid working with the
opposite sex. Research hasn’t yet
confirmed whether the teaching method is more effective than more traditional
approaches, but I believe that there is no way this teaching style
will benefit students. It dissuades students from interacting with and learning
about the opposite sex and makes them ill-prepared to face the future when they’ll
be forced to work in a mixed environment.
While
I understand the goals of this experiment, I believe they are ultimately
misguided. For instance, we see in the article how the teacher for the boys and
the teacher for the girls run their classes completely differently. This reinforces
the idea that girls and women are one way and boys and men are another, but we
know today that not all men are exactly the same, nor are all women. I saw a
commercial for a movie the other day that was about how boys are raised being
taught that boys don’t cry, and they often have trouble expressing their
emotions. Mr. Napolitano treating his group of boys like a basketball coach is
exactly the kind of treatment that creates issues like this. I think society
has come to the understanding that boys need girls around so that they can
learn about a broader spectrum of behavior than simply yelling and roughhousing
and sports. Additionally, the girls’ class is being taught as if the students
there are all fragile and emotional. This is ridiculous to me, because not all
girls respond to this kind of coddling. They need boys around to balance out
this treatment.
Another
problem with this program is that it does not prepare students for the future.
Sure, Samell Little is quoted as saying that his son is focusing better in
school now that there aren’t girls around, but if his son is having that much
trouble focusing now, how will it get better without him being taught how to
focus and behave. Taking away the distraction is not the same as teaching him
how to overcome it. One day he will be forced to work with women, and he will
not know how to handle it. In the article, Kim Gandy seems to see this problem
as well and states that “a boy who has never been beaten by a girl on an
algebra test could have some major problems having a female supervisor.” I
remember what it was like being a flirtatious and distracted middle schooler. I
think learning how to get past that and focusing is one of the big lessons
school is there to teach. Without this lesson, we’ll end up in the working
world with men not trusting women’s math skills and women confused why men don’t
respond when they don’t treat them like a coach would. This does not help them
be successful in the future.
In
conclusion, I don’t support separating students by gender. Some students may be more successful in the short
run, but in the end it will only cause them problems down the road. I think it’s better to teach our students how to interact with each
other rather than trying to keep them apart.
In each body paragraph:
Topic sentence
At least 1 reference to the article (something specific)Discussion of the reference (don't just refer and leave it standing alone)
Evidence (something from your life, example of a similar situation, something you saw or read, something you heard about, etc)
Discussion should always aim to prove your thesis
Topic sentence
At least 1 reference to the article (something specific)Discussion of the reference (don't just refer and leave it standing alone)
Evidence (something from your life, example of a similar situation, something you saw or read, something you heard about, etc)
Discussion should always aim to prove your thesis
Source:
“Many Students Say Cheating Is OK” by Kathy Slobogin, published a CNN.U.S.
“Many Students Say Cheating Is OK” by Kathy Slobogin, published a CNN.U.S.
Main Idea(s):
Many students do not have a problem with cheating
Many students do not have a problem with cheating
Supporting
Details:
Pressure and competition
Getting into good schools
The internet
Poor example set by the adult world
Teachers have started using new methods to fight cheating
Pressure and competition
Getting into good schools
The internet
Poor example set by the adult world
Teachers have started using new methods to fight cheating
Two sides?
Not really, though do mention both the students’ and teachers’ efforts
Not really, though do mention both the students’ and teachers’ efforts
Possible beginnings:
In Kathy Slobogin’s article, “Many Students Say
Cheating is OK” adapted from CNN.U.S, she explains that a large number of …
Kathy Slobogin’s article, “Many Students Say Cheating
is OK” adapted from CNN.U.S, explains that a large number of …
In “Many Students Say Cheating is OK,” adapted from
CNN.U.S, Kathy Slobogin explains that a large number of …
“Many Students Say Cheating is OK,” written by Kathy
Slobogin and adapted from CNN.U.S, explains that a large number of …
According to Kathy Slobogin’s article “Many Students
Say Cheating is OK,” adapted from CNN.U.S, a large number of …
According “Many Students Say Cheating is OK,” written
by Kathy Slobogin and adapted from CNN.U.S, a large number of …
You CANNOT say:
According to “Many Students Say Cheating is OK,”
written by Kathy Slobogin and adapted from CNN.U.S, explains that a large number of …
According to “Many Students Say Cheating is OK,”
written by Kathy Slobogin and adapted from CNN.U.S. (Fragment)
In Kathy Slobogin’s article, “Many Students Say
Cheating is OK” adapted from CNN.U.S, she explains that a large number of today’s students
find no problem with cheating. They are
found to cite the pressure of competition and the need to get into a good
school as justification. The internet has also made plagiarism so easy that any
student willing to pay can have their homework completed in minutes. Finally,
some say the adult world sets a poor example for students, which leads to their
cheating. Now, teachers are having to work just as fast as students to
come up with and use new ways to combat the amount of dishonesty in students’
work these days.